Legal Opinion
In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 5, 2002No. 01-3565PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal from the grant of summary judgment for the defendants in an antitrust class action charging price fixing in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. 156 F.Supp.2d 1017 (C.D.Ill.2001). The defendants are the principal manufacturers of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) — Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), A.E. Staley, Cargill, American Maize-Products, and CPC Inter national (which has settled with the plaintiffs, however, and thus is no longer a party). The plaintiffs represent a certified class consisting of direct purchasers from the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- In Re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation MdlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.