Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Garfield Hts., Unpublished Decision (8-11-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 2005No. Nos. 85420, 85426Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellants/cross-appellees Ronald and Nikki Rose (collectively referred to as the "Roses") and appellant/cross-appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company ("Nationwide") appeal the trial court's decision granting summary judgment to appellee/cross-appellant Clarendon National Insurance Company ("Clarendon"). Clarendon cross-appeals the trial court's finding that UM/UIM coverage arose by operation of law.

I. FACTS

{¶ 2} Ronald Rose was struck by an unidentified motorist while, in the course and scope of his employment with the City of Garfield Heights as a police…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Girgis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API