Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1996No. 1995-0135Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 454.] RAMSEY, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Ramsey v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.,

1996-Ohio-209.] Insurance—Uninsured motorist provision—R.C. 3937.18 and public policy preclude contract provision requiring physical contact for recovery. (No. 95-135—Submitted April 15, 1996—Decided May 15, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-94-156. __________________ Schlageter, Breier & Bryce Co., L.P.A., Robert W. Bryce and Teresa M. Dewey Bacho, for appellant. Stephen A.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Girgis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API