Legal Opinion
Barr v. McGraw-Hill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1991No. 87 Civ. 6259 (KC), 88 Civ. 2498 (KC), 88 Civ. 2446 (KC), 89 Civ. 3730 (KC) and 90 Civ. 6938 (KC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
Defendant McGraw-Hill, Inc. (“McGrawHill”) moves for an order, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c), 1 dismissing plaintiffs’ federal securities claims as time-barred. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
These five related actions, which have been consolidated for certain purposes, all arise out of the syndication and marketing, in the years 1979 to 1983, of approximately 30 limited partnerships that were intended to acquire and market videotapes to be used in the field of continuing medical education. Each of the limited…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Welyczko v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Brichard Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Berning v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Continental Bank, National Ass'n v. Village of LudlowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Borden, Inc. v. Spoor Behrins Campbell & Young, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.