Legal Opinion
In Re Brichard Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 1992No. C-87-2987 CALPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEGGE, District Judge.
On September 13, 1991, this court dismissed, on the ground of the statute of limitations, the § 10(b)-5- claims which plaintiffs had brought against defendant Price Waterhouse & Co. Plaintiffs now bring this motion pursuant to section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asking the court to reinstate those claims. Price Waterhouse opposes this motion on the ground that section 27A violates the constitutional separation of powers between the judicial and legislative branches.
The court considered the moving and opposing papers, the applicable…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Niel v. GRONDAHL, Appellant, v. MERRITT & HARRIS, INC., Elliott “Buzz” Harris, III, Charles J. Seidler, Jr. and Lane & Mittendorf, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Adler v. Berg Harmon AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Brown v. Hutton GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.