Rudiger v. . Coleman
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 12, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 12, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought upon the alleged breach of a contract entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants on the 16th day of June, 1899. The main recitals and covenants of the contract are, in substance, that the plaintiffs were the owners of the “ Field farm” in the town of Cortlandt, Westchester county, in this state, upon which there was a large and…
1Opinion of the CourtWerner, J.
Although the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not signed at the end thereof in the usual form, and are not supplemented by a direction for the entry of judgment in accordance therewith, each finding and conclusion is marked found by the court, and upon them judgment has been entered without objection from counsel for the plaintiffs. Since both parties have treated the entry of judgment as regular, we must so regard it for the purposes of this appeal. The findings of fact clearly support the conclusions of law, and the unanimous affirmance of the judgment entered upon them is,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. GulbenkianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Rudiger v. . ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Davis v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- MacLean v. FoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rudiger v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.