Legal Opinion

Rudiger v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Jules Breuchaud and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 26th day of Hay, 1911, upon a remittitur from the Court of Appeals, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day directing the entry of said interlocutory judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

Upon the trial of this action the learned court at Special Term made elaborate findings of fact, and reached the conclusion of law that the plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed upon the merits, with costs to the defendants. The case had been previously tried. Upon the first trial of the action the defendants were directed to specifically perform the contract between the parties for the formation of a corporation. The interlocutory judgment was reversed. (112 App. Div. 279.) Upon a retrial of the case it was held that the plaintiffs had failed to establish a case calling upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudiger v. . ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Rudiger v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rudiger v. . ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Breuchaud v. RudigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Rudiger v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API