Legal Opinion

MacLean v. Fox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1931No. 2509PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J:

The amended petition contains averments showing the contract to be as above indicated and that the plaintiffs immediately following the execution of the contract, devoted their time and experience to the development of the business and that they have performed all of the provisions required of them by the contract, but the defendant refuses to comply therewith. The contract as pleaded contains various provisions which show that many other matters relating to the corporation were left uncertain and indefinite. The articles of incorporation db not appear to have been agreed upon,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rudiger v. . ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Herley, Inc. v. HarschOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Schmidt v. MalavazosOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API