Legal Opinion

Control Techniques, Inc. v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2002No. 45S03-0202-CV-97PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

This case deals with the relationship between the Comparative Fault Act and the common law tort doctrine of superseding or intervening cause. The requirement of causation as an element of lability for a negligent act includes the requirement that the consequences be foreseeable. A superseding cause that forecloses liability of the original actor is, by definition, not reasonably foreseeable by a person standing in the shoes of that actor. Accordingly, the doctrine of superseding cause is simply an application of the larger concept of causation. Because an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hooks SuperX, Inc. v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. April Goodwin, Tiffany Randolph and Javon Washington v. Yeakle's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Paragon Family Restaurant v. BartoliniIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Simon v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API