Michigan Aluminum Foundry Co. v. Aluminum Castings Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan
At-Law. Action by the Michigan-Aluminum Foundry Company agaihát the Aluminum Castings Company and others. ■ On motion by defendant Alujninum Company of America to set aside service. . On, motion by defendant Aluminum Company 'of America, upon special appearance^ to set aside service of process in a suit at law under- section 7,'Act July;2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 210-(U. S. Comp.
Read the full summary
At-Law. Action by the Michigan-Aluminum Foundry Company agaihát the Aluminum Castings Company and others. ■ On motion by defendant Alujninum Company of America to set aside service. . On, motion by defendant Aluminum Company 'of America, upon special appearance^ to set aside service of process in a suit at law under- section 7,'Act July;2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 210-(U. S. Comp. St. 1901, 'p.',3202), to protect trade'and commerce .agdinst unlawful restraint ¡and monopolies. . ,
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a Michigan corporation. The defendant Aluminum Company of America is a Pennsylvania corporation, with its home office in that state. Service of the original summons was made in Detroit upon one E. H. Brown, a sales agent of the defendant who resides in Grosse P'ointe township, Mich., and does business in Detroit. Service of an alias summons was made at Detroit upon one E. K. Davis, general sales agent of the defendant, who resides in Pennsylvania.
The defendant insists that the service is not sufficient. Several affidavits have been filed in support of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Dyar v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- American Car & Foundry Inv. Corp. v. Chandler-Groves Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
- Walton N. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. Commercial Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Wallace v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925