Legal Opinion

Gallogly v. Calhoon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 1994No. 91-03-01847, CA A77455PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals the order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. He argues that the judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction, because he was never properly served. ORCP 71B(1)(d). We affirm.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in March, 1991, alleging that defendant assaulted him in July, 1990. According to the record, both parties were Oregon residents at the time of the incident, and defendant was a member of the Oregon State Bar (OSB) and a member of the Oregon legislature. Before filing the complaint, plaintiff hired private investigators to find defendant and sent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Beckett v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoeck v. Schwabe, Williamson & WyattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Yen Linh Thi Pham v. FaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Stull v. HokeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Stull v. Ash Creek Estates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API