Stull v. Ash Creek Estates, LLC
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion to set aside a judgment. They argue that the trial court abused its discretion in holding that their failure to file a response to defendants’ summary judgment motion was not excusable neglect. We affirm.
Plaintiffs filed an action against defendants in August 2000, alleging breach of contract and unlawful debt collection. On March 9,2001, defendants moved for summary judgment. Defendants served their summary judgment motion on plaintiffs’ counsel at the address listed in the Oregon State Bar annual membership directory, as they had done…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- King v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Reitz v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF EUGENECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Terlyuk v. KrasnogorovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Johnson v. Sunriver Resort Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Hoddenpyl v. FiskumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016