Legal Opinion
Robert M. Mowbray and Rose A. Mowbray v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. And Michael French
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 3, 1986No. 85-1647PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought below by plaintiffs-appellants, Robert M. Mowbray and Rose A. Mowbray, against their former stockbroker Michael French, and his employer, a Burlington, Vermont stock brokerage firm known as Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. (“Moseley”). Plaintiffs’ basic claim below was for alleged excessive trading or “churning” of their accounts by defendants. Plaintiffs also alleged fraudulent misrepresentation by defendant French in recommending particular investments. Plaintiffs sought to recover damages pursuant to Rule 10b of the Securities…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Cauble v. Mabon Nugent & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- El Dia, Inc. v. Rafael Hernandez ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Laura Anne Aiello v. Providian Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Carol O'COnnOr v. R.F. Lafferty & Company, Inc. And Roy A. FoulkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.