Legal Opinion
Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 11, 1943No. 70PublishedCited by 254 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
The Circuit Court of Appeals has certified the following question:
“In a civil action in a district court upon a claim of a character formerly cognizable at law in which the defendant has filed a counterclaim of a character formerly cognizable in equity (or in an action at law under the provisions of Section 274b 1 of the Judicial Code), is an order that the issue raised by the counterclaim shall be heard and disposed of by the court prior to the issue raised by the complaint an order granting an injunction within the meaning of Section 129 2 of the Judicial Code and therefore appealable under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Griesa v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
3Cited by254 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- In Re: Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor-Appellant v. Shell Oil Co. And Scallop Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.