Kirkpatrick v. . McCracken
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Lome, J., at January Term, 1912, of Haywood. Civil action. Tbe action involved tbe title to land, and tbe usual issues were submitted and found for plaintiff and tbe damage assessed at $15. From tbe judgment rendered, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBbowN, J.
Tbis controversy concerns tbe location of a boundary line between plaintiff’s and defendant’s lands, a prolific source of litigation between “Angry” Saxons, as said by tbe counsel for plaintiff.
There is involved tbe narrow strip of land lying between tbe red line, 1 to A, and tbe black line, 1 to 2, on tbe map, tbe plaintiff’s contention being represented by tbe black line and tbe defendant’s by tbe red. Tbe other lines shown on tbe map are not in dispute.
Both parties offered evidence tending to locate tbe line according to their respective contentions, which it is unnecessary to set out.
Tbe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Haddock v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Davidson v. . ArledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel v. Tallassee Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smothers v. SchlosserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Wadsworth v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Woodard v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.