Legal Opinion

Smothers v. Schlosser

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968No. 6818SC342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.

In the record filed herein the petitioners are sometimes referred to as plaintiffs and the respondents are sometimes referred to as defendants.

Respondents took fifty-three exceptions and group them in ten assignments of error. In their brief respondents assert that only two questions are presented; one, that the trial judge failed “to apply the correct rules of boundary law” and the other, that the trial judge failed to find “as a matter of law” that the disputed boundary line between the parties is that contended by respondents.

In Coley v. Telephone Co., 267 N.C. 701, 149 S.E. 2d 14, Justice…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Haddock v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boundary Dispute Between Lots 97 & 98 of the C.M. Bost Estate v. R.L. Wallace Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Northwestern Bank v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API