Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1978No. 776SC822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

We affirm the judgment of the superior court.

This action was converted from an action for wrongful cutting of timber and trespass to one to determine a boundary line. Boundary disputes are usually tried by special proceedings brought before the Clerk of Superior Court under Chapter 38 of the General Statutes. This statute is not jurisdictional, however, and by consent a boundary dispute may be originally tried before a superior court judge. Andrews v. Andrews, 252 N.C. 97, 113 S.E. 2d 47 (1960).

The appellants’ first contention is that the court committed error by not holding that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lerner Shops v. . RosenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Wiggins v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Kirkpatrick v. . McCrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Taylor v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faucette v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Canady v. CliffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API