Davidson v. . Arledge
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, tried before Avery, Judge, and a jury, at Spring Term, 1886, of Mecklenburg Superior Court. The following plat will explain the matter m controversy There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. The facts fully appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
When this cause was before the Court on the former appeal, 88 N. C., 326, and the title to the same narrow strip of territory formed by the different locations ■ of the boundary line between lots numbered 78 and 79 was in dispute, it appeared that William E. White, under a deed from Daniel Asbury made in 1858, and conveying the four lots, 69, 70, 77 and 78, the upper half of the square, and under a deed from the administrator of R. E. Carson, made in 1861, and conveying lots 79 and 80, one fourth of the square, became the owner of both lots 78 and 79 and the different antecedent locations of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davidson v. . ArledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Davis v. . McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Blow v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hanstein v. . FerrallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cheatham v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.