Keller v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment against them, after the demurrers of the defendants to the complaint had been sustained. Plaintiffs declined to amend and judgment was entered against them. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs “are the owners in fee of all that certain piece or parcel of land situate in the said City of Oakland, County of Alameda, State of California, lying between the northwestern curb line of that certain public street in said city known as ‘Fairmount Avenue’ and the southeastern line of that certain public street in said city known as ‘Piedmont…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Nicolson Pavement Co. v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- McNeil v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Polack v. Trustees of San Francisco Orphan AsylumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Imperial Beach v. AlgertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Buechner v. JonasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Snyder v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of Stockton v. Miles and Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.