Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holter v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Helena

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1959No. 9979Published

Submitted on Briefs.

1Dissent

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:

I dissent.

I do not believe that the trust deed speaks as of the time of the death of the surviving trustee. This trust deed was neither revocable nor amendable, it conveyed legal ownership of the corpus to the trustees, and at the time it was executed and delivered the transaction was complete and beyond the trustor’s power to recall. Bogert, Trusts & Trustees, secs. 41, 42, pp. 270, 271.

*33I believe-the intention of the trustor which must be determined here is that intention which she had in 1929, the time the deed was executed. Smyth v. McKissick, 222 N. C. 644, 24…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brock v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Smyth v. . McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Hills v. Travelers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Robson v. StoltzMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Trowbridge v. First-Stamford National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API