Legal Opinion

Robson v. Stoltz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1953No. 9248PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:

The principal question presented is whether, under the laws of Montana, a child by virtue of his adoption loses his right to inherit from his natural parent.

*174The Facts. Harry B. Kay took a wife and her name was Mildred Rowe Kay. And lie knew her and she conceived and bare him two sons who were named Harry Hillis Kay and Phillip Rowe Kay.

The marriage of Harry B. Kay and Mildred Rowe Kay endured for some ten years when, at the suit of the wife, the marriage was dissolved by decree entered in the district court of Dawson County, of which county the parties were then…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Darling v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Barber v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Estate of JobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Southside National Bank of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stark v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Franklin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Johnson v. Marias River Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Abramovic v. BrunkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API