Hannon v. Nuevo Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to change the place of trial. Geo. H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant Nuevo Land Company appeals from an order of court denying its motion for a change of place of trial from Los Angeles county, wherein the action was commenced, to the county of Riverside.
The motion was made upon the ground that said defendant was a corporation having its principal place of business in the county of Riverside; that its codefendant Union Hardware and Metal Company was not a necessary or proper party in the action, which involves the determination of an interest or estate in real property located in Riverside county. It appears both from the complaint and affidavit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Quint v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hays v. CowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Aisbett v. Paradise Mountain Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Schramm-Johnson Drugs v. Cox, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Tomasello v. TomaselloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952