Legal Opinion

EEOC v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-2277C(2)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

589 F.Supp. 534 (1984)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Applicant,

v.

PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL AND CO., Respondent.

No. 83-2277C(2).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri.

June 20, 1984.

James R. Neely, Robert B. Curtis, Donna L. Harper, St. Louis, Mo., for applicant.

Kohn, Shands, Elbert, Gianovlakis & Giljum, Alan C. Kohn, Mark J. Bremer, Linda Douglas Wuestner, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

FILIPPINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a determination whether a subpoena duces tecum issued to respondent Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. ("Peat, Marwick") should…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Ex Parte EndoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Hyland v. New Haven Radiology AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hyland v. New Haven Radiology AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Caruso v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API