Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1987No. 86 Civ. 3408 (JMW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Conrad S. Caruso (“Caruso”) has brought the instant age discrimination action against Defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (“Peat Marwick”), his former employer. Defendant moves to dismiss, alleging that Caruso’s status as a partner bars his invocation as an “employee” of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. 1 For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Defendant Peat Marwick is a major American accounting and consulting firm, employing several…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Norwood v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1331, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,294 Selene Weise v. Syracuse University, Jo Davis Mortenson v. Syracuse UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- P. Larue Simpson v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ehrlich v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Bechtle (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Cohen v. S.U.P.A. Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Caruso v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.