C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
The Fish and Game Commission of California, having seized a purse net while it was being used for fishing in the navigable waters of the state in violation of the State Fish and Game Code, brought the present proceeding under § 845 of the Code for forfeiture of the net. The question for decision is whether the state court’s judgment, directing that the net be forfeited and ordering the commission to sell or destroy it, is a “common law remedy” which the “common law is competent to give” within the statutory exception to the exclusive jurisdiction in admiralty conferred on district courts of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.