Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 6 Div. 830, 831PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The circumstances when a judgment non obstante veredicto will be rendered, or when a motion in arrest of judgment or for a re-pleader will be granted have been referred to in several of our eases, and in numerous decisions of other courts, following the common law.

Originally a judgment non obstante veredicto was 'available to plaintiff only, but by relaxation of this early common-law rule “the generally prevailing rule now is that either plaintiff or defendant may have” such a judgment “in proper cases.” 33 Corpus Juris, 1178-1180; Chapman v. Holding, 60 Ala. 522.

An arrest of judgment on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Woodward Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Campbell v. BeyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Mudge v. TreatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Luker v. City of BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Alabama Equity Corporation v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API