City of Birmingham v. Andrews
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The circumstances when a judgment non obstante veredicto will be rendered, or when a motion in arrest of judgment or for a re-pleader will be granted have been referred to in several of our eases, and in numerous decisions of other courts, following the common law.
Originally a judgment non obstante veredicto was 'available to plaintiff only, but by relaxation of this early common-law rule “the generally prevailing rule now is that either plaintiff or defendant may have” such a judgment “in proper cases.” 33 Corpus Juris, 1178-1180; Chapman v. Holding, 60 Ala. 522.
An arrest of judgment on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Campbell v. BeyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Mudge v. TreatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Luker v. City of BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Alabama Power Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Alabama Equity Corporation v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.