Legal Opinion

MacKintosh Co. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 6 Div. 893PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The assignments of error are properly grouped and argued, Polytinsky v. Johnston, 211 Ala. 99, 99 So. 839; Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Graft, 210 Ala. 683, 99 So. 167; Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, 211 Ala. 367, 100 So. 349, 34 A. L. R. 526, and will be so considered by this court.

The trial was had on counts 1 and 2; the wanton count was withdrawn. The negligent failure averred in the respective counts was as to a reasonably safe place to work and a reasonably safe machine for those who were required or invited to be upon or about it in the discharge of the duties of his employment…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. City Council of Montgomery v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Elba Wood Products, Inc. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Alabama Power Company v. MosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API