Legal Opinion

Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1934No. 5 Div. 180PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The judge is alleged to have made a bench note on the verdict finding for plaintiff and assessing the damages. Unless it otherwise appears to be ordered by the court, there is a duty thereby impliedly directed to be performed by the clerk to enter the judgment at length on the minutes. Besides the cases cited by the Court of Appeals, we note that 1 Freeman on Judgments, § 48, makes the same assertion with a list of cases. The judgment is only proven by the minutes, and unless formally entered on the minutes it is not appealable, and not provable as a completed judgment.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Wynn v. McCraneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Campbell v. BeyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Bell v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McDanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. LeFlore v. State Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Du Pree v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API