Legal Opinion

Levy v. Bromberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Ershler Brothers, Inc., sues to recover the balance due, $2,499.67, for merchandise amounting to $3,099.67, upon which $600 was paid on May 11th, 1927, sold and delivered to the defendant between May 2d and May 14th, 1927. There is no question upon the evidence that this merchandise was sold and delivered to defendant at the specified price and that the balance of $2,499.67 is due unless the defendant had paid for a part of this or was entitled to certain deductions and offsets. The defendant’s defenses are that upon the account from May…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Koops v. GreggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Horvath v. TontiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Butler v. SteckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Harris v. ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API