Legal Opinion

Reed v. Abrahamson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1992No. 9015SC568PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants each set forth separate assignments of error for our review and we shall address each individually. First, defendant Barwick contends the trial court erred in denying her motion for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. She bases this assertion on three independent and alternative arguments. Defendant Barwick first claims that there was insufficient evidence to send the issue of her negligence to the jury. In the alternative, she asserts that even if there was competent evidence to establish negligence on the part of defendant Barwick, either…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Schaefer v. WicksteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potter v. Hilemn Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Sobczak v. VorholtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Moreau v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API