Legal Opinion
Schmitt v. Felix
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1958No. Civ. 17579PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment of $4,208.27 against all defendants. Defendants Cohn and Zipkin appeal.
Questions Presented
1. Does holding over by one lessee bind other lessees not in possession (a) as to an extended term of the lease, and (b) as to a month to month tenancy thereafter.
2. Effect of notices of termination of tenancy.
Stipulated Facts
Plaintiff C. E. Schmitt and his wife, Edith M. Schmitt, entered into a lease with the three defendants for a period of one year ending March 31, 1953, rental $475 per month. The lease granted lessees an option for an additional year after March 31,1953,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ross v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Howell v. BehlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Knox v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bockelmann v. MarynickTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Cicinelli v. IwasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Parkmerced Co. v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Smith v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.