Legal Opinion
State v. Frank
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 15, 2002No. 48205-0-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cox, A.C.J.
At issue is whether the arraignment procedures of the Whatcom County District Court violate due process so as to require the setting of a constructive arraignment date. Because there was no violation of due process and Michael Frank fails to establish prejudice, we reverse the decision of the superior court and reinstate his conviction for driving under the influence.
The facts are undisputed. On June 12, 1995, Frank was arrested for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) and driving with a suspended license. That evening, he was released on his personal recognizance. At…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. Van TuylCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. Van TuylCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Lewis v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Lewis v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSINGCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.