Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Van Tuyl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 4, 2006No. 23693-5-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 We analyze the interplay between the restraining order provisions in chapter 26.09 RCW (marriage dissolution) and chapter 26.50 RCW (domestic violence). During Cindy Van Tuyl and James Van Tuyl’s marriage dissolution, the court granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) under chapter 26.09 RCW. Ms. Van Tuyl was later charged and convicted of violating the order under chapter 26.50 RCW. We hold RCW 26.09.300(1) sets the knowledge requirement consistent with RCW 26-.50.110(1) despite the actual notice language of RCW 26-.09.050(2). A TRO issued under chapter 26.09 RCW can serve as a basis…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. Van TuylCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API