Legal Opinion
State v. Van Tuyl
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 4, 2006No. 23693-5-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
133 P.3d 955 (2006)
132 Wash.App. 750
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Cindy L. VAN TUYL, Petitioner.
No. 23693-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
May 4, 2006.
Kelly W. Padgham, Phillabuam Ledlin et. al., Spokane, WA, for Petitioner.
Amee Jean Sobczak Tilger, Attorney at Law, Wenatchee, WA, for Respondent.
BROWN, J.
¶ 1 We analyze the interplay between the restraining order provisions in chapter 26.09 RCW (marriage dissolution) and chapter 26.50 RCW (domestic violence). During Cindy Van Tuyl and James Van Tuyl's marriage dissolution, the court granted a temporary restraining order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. WeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.