Lantz v. Lantz

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Warren Lantz appeals the trial court’s order and judgment requiring him to pay his former wife Dorothy alimony arrearag-es totalling $167,812.50. Warren argues that the trial court applied the incorrect statute of limitations and that it erred in denying his laches defense. None of Warren’s arguments have merit.

The superior court’s order and judgment is affirmed.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Warren filed for divorce from his wife Dorothy in December 1977. An initial hearing was held before Judge Buckalew on May 18, 1978. The transcript reveals that the great…