Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Western Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1960No. Sac. 7232PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendant predicated upon the sustaining, without leave to amend, of a demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint in an action to recover damages for injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

The amended complaint alleged that while plaintiff was employed by defendant as a train dispatcher, defendant “negligently and carelessly required” him “to be subjected . . . to working conditions of unusual responsibility, stress and tension” in that he was “required to operate a system of central traffic control of defendant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Hahn v. MirdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Morgan Yawn, Jr. v. Southern Railway Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Jim Buell v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API