Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Speeth v. Carney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1955No. 33926Published

1Opinion of the CourtHajrt, J.

The answer of the respondent sets out 10 affirmative defenses, four of which present three fundamental questions involving the constitutionality of the subway act, five raise questions involving the alleged irregularity and alleged insufficiency of the procedure followed by the relator in attempting to authorize the issuance of the note and bonds, and one presents both constitutional and procedural questions.

I

In the first, sixth and ninth defenses of respondent’s answer it is alleged, in substance, that the proposed note and bonds would be issued to make a gift of the proceeds to the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. State Road Commission v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API