Legal Opinion

Schnoerr v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1965No. 38817PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It is appellants’ contention that this present action does not lie. They argue that a specific remedy by statute, an election contest, is provided for the correction of errors, frauds and mistakes which may occur in an election. They urge that no such contest was instituted, and that appellee cannot raise a question as to the validity of the election by injunction. State, ex rel. Shriver, County Engr., v. Hayes, 148 Ohio St. 681; State, ex rel. Commissioners of Sinking Fund, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 167 Ohio St. 71.

The question before the court however is not the validity of the election on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shriver v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Board of Education of Ashville Village School Dist. v. BriggsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Curren v. ReesOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. FlickOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New Jersey Association on Correction v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Voters First v. Ohio Ballot BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION ON CORRECTION v. LanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API