Grossman v. Emergency Cesspool & Sewer Cleaners, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*441OPINION OF THE COURT
John A. Milano, J.
Defendants move by order to show cause why an order should not be made pursuant to CPLR 2304 quashing a subpoena duces tecum and why a protective order should not be made pursuant to CPLR 3122, as to a notice of production, both served by fax upon the defendants on July 12, 1994 on the ground that the materials sought are attorney work product and are prepared in anticipation of litigation and for trial and for such other and further relief as may be just, proper and equitable.
This is a personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Careccia v. EnstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marigliano v. KrumholtzNew York Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hicklen v. Broadway West Street AssociatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
- Barnes v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Beckford v. GrossNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Beckford v. GrossNew York Supreme Court, Monroe County · 2004
- Koksal v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2017