Legal Opinion
Marigliano v. Krumholtz
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph M. Lane, J.
The issue presented in this case of first impression involves the construction of the newly enacted legislative statute, subdivision (i) of CPLR 3101 (L 1993, ch 574, eff Sept. 1, 1993). The statute provides: "[i]n addition to any other matter which may be subject to disclosure, there shall be full disclosure of any films, photographs, video tapes or audio tapes, including transcripts or memoranda thereof, involving a person referred to in paragraph one of subdivision (a) of this section [CPLR 3101]. There shall be disclosure of all portions of such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rios v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boulware v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Grossman v. Emergency Cesspool & Sewer Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Barnes v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Beckford v. GrossNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Beckford v. GrossNew York Supreme Court, Monroe County · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.