Koksal v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arlene P. Bluth, J.
The motion by plaintiff to strike the answers of defendant the City of New York and defendant Petrocelli Electric Co., Inc. or, in the alternative, striking these defendants’ notices of intention is granted only to the extent that the portion of the surveillance videos shot in a courthouse cannot be used at trial.
Background
This action arises out of an alleged motor vehicle accident wherein plaintiff, who was driving a motorcycle or motor scooter, was involved in a collision with a car owned by defendant Adel Construction and operated by defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grossman v. Emergency Cesspool & Sewer Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994