Legal Opinion

Koksal v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arlene P. Bluth, J.

The motion by plaintiff to strike the answers of defendant the City of New York and defendant Petrocelli Electric Co., Inc. or, in the alternative, striking these defendants’ notices of intention is granted only to the extent that the portion of the surveillance videos shot in a courthouse cannot be used at trial.

Background

This action arises out of an alleged motor vehicle accident wherein plaintiff, who was driving a motorcycle or motor scooter, was involved in a collision with a car owned by defendant Adel Construction and operated by defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grossman v. Emergency Cesspool & Sewer Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API