Legal Opinion

Hicklen v. Broadway West Street Associates

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 18, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*13OPINION OF THE COURT

Bert A. Bunyan, J.

Plaintiffs move to preclude third-party defendant from offering into evidence or otherwise using at trial certain surveillance materials, or, in the alternative, providing plaintiffs an opportunity to review the original videotape of plaintiff, Shirley Hicklen, made on behalf of third-party defendant; giving plaintiffs’ expert an opportunity to review said tape; and producing each person who videotaped plaintiff for an examination before trial.

This is a personal injury action arising out of a slip and fall, on or about April 21, 1989, at defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Royal Food Products, Inc. v. Buckeye Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Boulware v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Grossman v. Emergency Cesspool & Sewer Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Barnes v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1998
  4. Zegarelli v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API