Legal Opinion

Water Improvement District 1 of Benton v. Briner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoTIaney, J.

Appellants, Municipal Improvements Districts of Benton, Arkansas, filed suit in the Saline Chancery Court on September 8, 1931, to enforce the collection of delinquent improvement taxes. The complaints for this purpose were signed by M. H. Holleman, as solicitor. The appellee intervened in these suits, alleging that he is the city attorney of the city of Benton, duly elected, qualified and acting; that appellants are local improvement districts, one the water district, the other a sewer district, organized under the general improvement district laws of the State, and are situated wholly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 349Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 324Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API