Slaughter v. Friedman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
The case involves the defenses to a libel action. The central issue is' the application of section 592A of the Restatement Second of Torts, which creates an absolute privilege for “[o]ne who is required by law to publish defamatory matter .... ” Noting that section 592A contains a privilege different from, and more extensive than, the absolute privileges of section 47 of the Civil Code, we conclude that the adoption of the Restatement rule is a matter more appropriately left to the Legislature. We further conclude that plaintiff has adequately al*153leged defendants’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
- Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wilbanks v. WolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.