Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. Friedman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1982No. L.A. 31541PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

The case involves the defenses to a libel action. The central issue is' the application of section 592A of the Restatement Second of Torts, which creates an absolute privilege for “[o]ne who is required by law to publish defamatory matter .... ” Noting that section 592A contains a privilege different from, and more extensive than, the absolute privileges of section 47 of the Civil Code, we conclude that the adoption of the Restatement rule is a matter more appropriately left to the Legislature. We further conclude that plaintiff has adequately al*153leged defendants’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Wilbanks v. WolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API