Dwyer v. State
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice
delivered the Opinion of the Court. .
1 1 In this original proceeding, we consider the legality of the "negative factor," a legislative enactment that operates to reduce education funding across all Colorado school districts. - Plaintiffs below sued the State of Colorado, the Commissioner of Education, and the Governor (collectively, "the State"), arguing that the negative factor is unconstitutional because it violates Amendment 23, a constitutional provision requiring annual increases to "statewide base per pupil funding." After the trial court denied the State's motion to dismiss, we issued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Common Sense Alliance v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Colorado Ethics Watch v. Senate Majority Fund, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Goodman v. Heritage BuildersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Magill v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Norton v. Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Griffith v. SSC Pueblo Belmont Operating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Reeves-Toney v. School District No. 1 in City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.