Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 21, 2015No. 15SA22PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice

delivered the Opinion of the Court. .

1 1 In this original proceeding, we consider the legality of the "negative factor," a legislative enactment that operates to reduce education funding across all Colorado school districts. - Plaintiffs below sued the State of Colorado, the Commissioner of Education, and the Governor (collectively, "the State"), arguing that the negative factor is unconstitutional because it violates Amendment 23, a constitutional provision requiring annual increases to "statewide base per pupil funding." After the trial court denied the State's motion to dismiss, we issued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Common Sense Alliance v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Colorado Ethics Watch v. Senate Majority Fund, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Goodman v. Heritage BuildersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Magill v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Norton v. Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. Griffith v. SSC Pueblo Belmont Operating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. Reeves-Toney v. School District No. 1 in City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API