Legal Opinion

Griffith v. SSC Pueblo Belmont Operating Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 26, 2016No. Supreme Court Case 16SA114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice

¶1 This case raises the following question: When may a nonresident parent company be haled into a Colorado court based on the activities of its resident subsidiary? We hold that, to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident parent company, a trial court shall perform the following analysis: First, the trial court shall determine whether it may pierce the corporate veil and impute the.resident subsidiary’s contacts to the nonresident parent company, If the resident subsidiary’s contacts.may be imputed to the nonresident parent company, the court shall analyze all of the nonresident…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stockdale v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. New Hampshire Insurance Company v. TSG Ski & GolfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  3. Align Corp. Ltd. v. Allister Mark BoustredSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Dill v. Rembrandt Group, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Props. Dev. Corp. v. HindsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API