MDS Associates, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a party plaintiff.* Defendant moved to exclude from the case any issue of patent infringement by the Government prior to June 29, 1987.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. On August 19, 1970, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) received Application No. 65,228 from Robert M. O’Hagan, Joseph F. De Spautz, James E. Carroll, Jr., and Richard H. Sorensen, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kingan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Custer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- National Australia Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.