Legal Opinion
3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 26, 2017No. 15-501CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge
Pending before the court in this patent case is plaintiffs’ motion to compel the government to produce documents and overrule objections, ECF No. 126. During the hearing on this motion, the court requested supplemental briefing regarding whether systems installed prior to February 12, 2013 are within the scope of potentially infringing systems, to assess whether the government should be compelled to produce documents regarding such systems. 1 The issue has been fully briefed by plaintiffs, the government, and defendant-intervenor Northrop Grumman Systems…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.