National Australia Bank v. United States

ORDER

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending are defendant’s motion to compel, plaintiffs’ joint motion to quash subpoenas for Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, and plaintiffs’ motion to substitute party pursuant to RCFC 25. For the reasons set out below, plaintiffs’ motion to quash is granted, defendant’s motion to compel is denied, and plaintiffs’ motion to substitute National Australia Bank is granted.

In their motion to substitute party pursuant to Rule 25(c), plaintiffs Michigan National Bank and Michigan National Corporation seek to have National Australia Bank substituted. Plaintiffs were wholly owned…