Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Philadelphia, LLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 2014No. 4 MAP 2014PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (the “UTPCPL” or “Act”) 1 provides a private cause of action to any person who, as a result of conduct that the UTPCPL prohibits, “suffers any ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal.” 73 P.S. § 201-9.2(a). The Superior Court held here that Appellee Christina Grimes’s retention of counsel to institute this suit constituted such an “ascertainable loss.” We reverse.

The facts, which we have taken from Appellee’s pleadings, are as follows. 2 Appellee signed a contract in December 2010, to rent a car from Appellant…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rushing, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Warrantech Consumer Products Services, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co. in LiquidationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dale Kaymark v. Bank of America NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Jarzyna v. Home Properties, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Kern v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. James Dehart v. Homeq Servicing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API